From the Ask Tom mailbag -
Question:
I was in your Time Span presentation about Elliott Jaques and Managerial Relationships. I recently discovered that our perceived organization chart is quite different that the one I had or felt was in place. I had all of my managers draw their view of our Org Chart so I can get a better grip on the disconnect. What is the best way to create the most accurate Org Chart and most importantly, implement it?
Response:
Interesting that Elliott faced this same dilemma. He described these various versions of the Org Chart this way -
- Manifest Org Chart – this is the published version
- Assumed Org Chart – this is the version that different people assume, as many versions as you have people. This is the version you received from your managers.
- Extant Org Chart – the way the Org Chart actually works, based on observations and interviews. This would include all the dysfunction, vagaries, dotted lines, stupid rules, end arounds and general mayhem.
- Requisite Org Chart – the design of managerial relationships based on Requisite principles.
A manager is that person in the organization held accountable for the output of their team. So, when I examine any role, it’s not a matter of who that role should report to. When I examine the role, it’s a matter of which manager is accountable for the output of this role.
This subtle shift is a game-changer. The Organization Chart is a visual depiction of managerial accountability, not “who reports to whom?”
But your question is how best to create this visual depiction. Ultimately, all crumbs lead to the top. I hold the CEO accountable for the design of the work. But the detail of this design is best hashed out in a series of meetings considering these questions –
- What is the work to be done, tasks to be completed?”
- What is the Level of Work?
- What role is best to complete the tasks?
- Which manager is accountable for the completion of those tasks (output)?
DIGITAL JUICE
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank's!